In Summary
  • Nine years ago, their leaders assured them that a new constitution would be the panacea for all the ills afflicting them.
  • It would make a lot of sense if these initiatives were sifted and the best of the proposals combined in one document that Kenyans can support or oppose.

Under normal circumstances, Kenya in its parlous economic state can barely afford another referendum, but it will happen all the same.

Unfortunately, we are busy holding several different monologues at once, and no one is listening to anyone else.

Some people say we need to overhaul the Constitution because it is not working well for us. Others believe it is a great document which only requires a little tweaking, thus precluding a referendum.

A third group believes that any attempt to tamper with the supreme law is a mere ruse to thwart their ambitions.

So far, three efforts have been hatched to do the job. The one most Kenyans know anything about so far is Dr Ekuru Aukot’s Punguza Mizigo Initiative, a populist document that contains many attractive features, but which suffers acute weaknesses in vision.

With the first hurdle overcome – that of collecting at least a million signatures – Kenyans were enthusiastic.

They were particularly happy about the proposals to drastically reduce representation in Parliament and to give ward representatives control over the money disbursed to the counties.

Members in both houses of Parliament were not impressed. Nor were the governors.


As a result, Punguza Mizigo has found it impossible to surmount the second barrier.

Although MCAs initially salivated over all the millions they would control, they reckoned without the views of the “patrons of change” who could not stomach the idea of any other outfit stealing the thunder from their own preconceived outcomes.

Neither Jubilee nor ODM care much for Punguza Mizigo, and they have worked hard to ensure it is rejected.

So far, only Uasin Gishu has endorsed it. And short of a miracle, the Punguza Mizigo (Constitution of Kenya Amendment) Bill, 2019, is highly unlikely to gain the support of the 25 county assemblies it requires.

Another hurdle on its way is by the new-fangled County Assemblies Forum, which has purportedly banned further debate on the bill until October 15, when all the assemblies will vote on it.

Whether this ban holds any water is debatable, for it is not even clear whether it is lawful.


It looks like poor Aukot has become a modern-day Sisyphus, forever rolling a huge boulder up a hill to the top, only for it to come crashing down. Whether he deserves this kind of punishment is another issue altogether.

Page 1 of 2