In Summary
  • The bill would make it mandatory that all the 416 MPs in the National Assembly and Senate get a house allowance, a vehicle fuelled and maintained by the taxpayer and a car loan.
  • The committee also wants an enhanced medical cover for MPs and that a budget be set aside for each of the 290 constituencies for monitoring and evaluation of national government projects.

National Assembly Speaker Justin Muturi has reminded MPs that they will not benefit from a bill to enhance their perks according to a proposal by the committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, even if they pass it.

This came as members of the National Assembly accused the media of blowing the matter out of proportion as they opened their intermittent sibling rivalry with the Senate over the passage of the Parliamentary Service Bill 2018. 

NEW CLAUSE

The Justice and Legal Affairs committee, chaired by Baringo North MP William Cheptumo, has proposed a new clause in the bill, which would make it mandatory that all the 416 MPs in the National Assembly and Senate get a house allowance, a vehicle fuelled and maintained by the taxpayer and a car loan.

The committee also wants an enhanced medical cover for MPs and that a budget be set aside for each of the 290 constituencies for monitoring and evaluation of national government projects, as well as public participation in parliamentary affairs.

The lawmakers’ medical scheme provides Sh10 million inpatient cover per family, Sh300,000 for outpatient cover, Sh150,000 for maternity and Sh75,000 for dental care. They also have a Sh7 million car grant and a Sh20 million mortgage facility.

The MPs accused the media of distorting the facts about the bill as they aimed invectives at their colleagues in the Senate for speaking ill of the bill and demanding that they, too, should scrutinise it.

CONSTITUTION

They were adamant that the bill is not about raising their salaries and perks, as that is the constitutional mandate of the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC).

However, Speaker Muturi reminded them that they would not benefit from it, even if the bill was passed and signed into law, in line with article 116 (3) of the Constitution.

“You cannot benefit from this as it will be against the Constitution,” Mr Muturi said.

The article provides that an Act of Parliament that confers a direct pecuniary interest on MPs shall not come into force until after the next General Election.

Mr Muturi did not spare the media from accusations of bad publicity, after Suna East MP Junet Mohamed sought his intervention, saying that coverage of the bill had been blown out of proportion.

MISINFORMATION

Mr Mohamed, Majority Leader Aden Duale (Garissa Township) and Minority Leader John Mbadi (Suba South) were apprehensive that continued “misinformation” on the bill was maligning the names of individual MPs and the House.

Page 1 of 2